Legal Opinion

Jarvis v. Hitch

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1903No. 20,151PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Gibson Circuit Court; O. M. Welborn, Judge. Action by Oscar Hitch against George T. Jarvis, receiver of the Louisville, Evansville '& St. Louis Consolidated Railroad Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court, under clause two of §1337j Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, C. J.

— This action was brought under the fourth 1 subdivision of §1 of the act of March 4, 1893 (Acts 1893, *218p. 294, §7083 Burns 1901) by appellee to recover damages for a personal injury received by him while in .the service of appellant by reason of the alleged negligence of a person in the service of said appellant who had “charge of a locomotive engine upon a railway.” A trial of said cause resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of appellee.

The errors assigned call in question the action of the court in overruling appellant’s demurrer to the complaint, appellant’s demurrer to the second…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. McDonald v. HoveySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Interstate Com. Commiss. v. B. & O. RAILROADSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Ryalls v. Mechanics' MillsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Board of Commissioners v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. State ex rel. KlausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Libby v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Dill v. FrazeIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Hirth-Krause Co. v. CohenIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API