Otto v. City of St. Paul
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORTON, Judge.
Plaintiff, Nicholas Otto, was injured by the collapse of a section of Sergeant Avenue in St. Paul. Appellant, City of St. Paul, determined the collapse was caused by a cavity under the street caused by a leaking sewer drain serving respondents’, Timothy and Linda Fugina’s, residence. The city challenges the trial court’s grant of a final partial summary judgment dismissing the city’s claim for contribution against respondent. We affirm.
FACTS
On July 11, 1988, Nicholas Otto was operating a front end loader on Sergeant Avenue in St. Paul. Suddenly and without warning, the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
- Vandenberg v. LosethDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994