Legal Opinion

Otto v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1990No. C9-90-712PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Plaintiff, Nicholas Otto, was injured by the collapse of a section of Sergeant Avenue in St. Paul. Appellant, City of St. Paul, determined the collapse was caused by a cavity under the street caused by a leaking sewer drain serving respondents’, Timothy and Linda Fugina’s, residence. The city challenges the trial court’s grant of a final partial summary judgment dismissing the city’s claim for contribution against respondent. We affirm.

FACTS

On July 11, 1988, Nicholas Otto was operating a front end loader on Sergeant Avenue in St. Paul. Suddenly and without warning, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubred v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Armstrong v. MailandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. Sauter Ex Rel. Benson v. SauterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. Pietila v. CongdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mallet v. PickensWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Vandenberg v. LosethDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API