Legal Opinion
Durrant v. Christensen
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1991No. 18817Published
1Opinion of the Court
821 P.2d 319 (1991)
120 Idaho 886
Orvil DURRANT and Faye Durrant, husband and wife; Kenneth W. Sellers, Plaintiffs-Respondents,
v.
Ruby CHRISTENSEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 18817.
Supreme Court of Idaho, Pocatello, September 1991 Term.
November 25, 1991.
Kerr Law Office, Blackfoot, for defendant-appellant. Robert J. Kerr, Jr., argued.
Whittier, McDougall, Souza, Murray & Clark, Chartered, Pocatello, for plaintiffs-respondents. John C. Souza, argued.
JOHNSON, Justice.
The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court abused its discretion in denying sanctions pursuant to I.R.C.P. 11(a)(1).…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Sun Valley Shopping Center, Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
- Eastway Construction Corp. v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Souffront v. La Compagnie Des Sucreries De Porto RicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.