Legal Opinion

City of Colorado Springs v. Miller

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 10, 1934No. 13,058PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holland

The defendant in error, Miller, was petitioner in the trial court and plaintiffs in error, City of Colorado Springs and Ray the building inspector, were respondents. Reference will be made to them as Miller, the city, and the building inspector.

Miller is the owner of a small dwelling house built on a lot 45x90 feet, facing north on Fontanero street and just west of the public alley as it intersects Fontanero street. To the west of petitioner’s property is the Musiek Drug Store built close to the west line of the 45x90 lot adjoining’ that of the petitioner, leaving a space of some-37 feet…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Colby v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  2. Marino v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  3. Bird v. City of Colorado SpringsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. McGough v. McCarthy Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  5. Di Salle v. GiggalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API