Legal Opinion
Citibank, N.A. v. Aralpa Holdings Limited Partnership and Rodrigo Lebois Mateos
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 21, 2026No. 1:22-cv-08842Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CITIBANK, N.A., Plaintiff, -against- Case No. 1:22-cv-08842 (JLR) ARALPA HOLDINGS LIMITED OPINION AND ORDER PARTNERSHIP and RODRIGO LEBOIS MATEOS, Defendants. JENNIFER L. ROCHON, United States District Judge: Before the Court are two motions: (1) Non-party Luis Barroso González’s (“Barroso” or “Putative Intervenor”) motion to intervene pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 24 and (2) Plaintiff Citibank, N.A.’s (“Citibank” or “Plaintiff”) motion to seal. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the motion to intervene…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Olson v. Major League BaseballCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.