Ali v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the final judgment in all respects except for the attorney's fee award. Because Wells Fargo failed to present any competent, substantial evidence to support the number of hours spent on the case, the hourly rate, or the total fee, we reverse that portion of the final judgment awarding attorney's fees.1 See Michel v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, 191 So.3d 981, 984 (Fla. 2d DCA 2016) ; see also B & H Miracle, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 227 So.3d 238, 239 (Fla. 1st DCA 2017) ; Freiman v. Nat'l City Mortg. Co., 183 So.3d 1111, 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) ; Warner v. Warner, 692 So.2d 266, 268…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rodriguez v. CampbellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- Sheila Diwaker v. Montecito Palm Beach Condominium AssociationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Colson v. State Farm Bank, F.S.B.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Michel v. The Bank of New York MellonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Bruce Freiman v. National City Mortgage Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.