Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 5, 1941No. 21377PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Judge.

This cause was reversed and remanded on the original hearing herein because of the use a second time of a previous conviction for the purpose of an enhancement of the penalty.

In this motion for a rehearing it is made to appear that the statement of facts and bills of exception herein were filed 103 days after the overruling of the motion for a new trial and notice of appeal in the lower court. This filing was too late. Art. 760, C. C. P. limits the maximum time within which bills of exception and statement of facts may be filed to 90 days after the date notice of appeal is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Chisholm and Dyball v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Retza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Crowder and Stein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. McKneely v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API