Kryptok Co. v. United Bifocal Co.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from an order of the District Court, Western District of New York, granting preliminary injunction.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of New York. This cause comes here upon appeal from an order of the District Court, Western District of New York, granting preliminary injunction. The suit is on two patents for improvements in bifocal lenses, No. 637,444, granted November 21, 1899, to John L. Borsch, and the other, No. 876,933, granted January 2l, 1908, to John D. Borsch, Jr. The following is the opinion of the District Court by HAZEL, District Judge. This action was brought tor infringement of letters patent, No. 637,444, granted to John L. Borsch,…
1Per curiam
The patents were fully considered on a full record at final hearing by Judge Van Valkenburg in the Western District of Missouri; both were sustained and infringement found. Kryptok Company v. Stead Lens Company, 207 Fed. 85.
In granting the injunction now appealed from Judge Hazel followed the opinion in that cause as to the position of the patents in the art. That cause was appealed to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit (214 Fed. 368, 131 C. C. A. 144) and we have now received from the clerk of that court a certified copy of the opinion, in all respects affirming the opinion…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Stead Lens Co. v. Kryptok Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Kryptok Co. v. Stead Lens Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Imperial Mach. Co. v. ReesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1919
- Imperial Machine & Foundry Corp. v. BlakesleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919