Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Shipowners' & Merchants' Tugboat Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1927No. 4869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). The trial court found that the collision was the result of faulty navigation upon the part of the captain of the Dodd in maneuvering his ship around the turn in the channel. Notwithstanding the *368well-settled rule that a finding of fact so made upon the testimony of witnesses taken before the eoiprt will not be disturbed by an appellate court except for manifest error, the appellant contends that here the rule does not apply for the reason that there was no evidence whatever to show negligence on the part of the officers of the Dodd. We do not so read the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The L. P. DaytonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Philadelphia & R. R. v. The Allie & EvieDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
  3. WilliamsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1903
  4. The StartleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bisso v. Waterways Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Eastern Tar Products Corp. v. Chesapeake Oil Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1939
  3. Bisso v. Waterways Transportation CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Oil Transport Co. v. The Lunga PointDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1959
  5. Alcoa Steamship Co. v. WalshDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API