Legal Opinion
Draeger v. Kent County Savings Ass'n.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided June 4, 1928No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This judgment should be reversed. The plaintiffs are husband and wife. The wife did not sign the contract. Her husband testified:
"I signed for myself and my wife. While it says that it is an application for installment shares at the top I did not see it, and when I signed this application to buy some shares of stock, and that was put there before me to sign, I did not read it and I do not think my wife read it. I am not in the habit of signing papers and agreements to purchase stocks although I have sometimes signed an agreement to purchase something that I didn't see with a good reliable…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCormack v. MolburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
- Gardner v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
3Cited by10 opinions
- International Transportation Ass'n v. BylengaMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Komraus Plumbing & Heating, Inc, v. Cadillac Sands Motel, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
- Kroeger, Supt. v. BrodyOhio Supreme Court · 1936
- Gary-Hobart Savings & Loan Ass'n v. StrongIndiana Court of Appeals · 1934
- Collateral Liquidation, Inc. v. ManningMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.