Saucedo v. John Hancock Life & Health Insurance Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGordon McCloud, J.
¶1 This case is a class action lawsuit by farmworkers against four corporate defendants. It requires us to answer two questions, certified to this court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, about Washington’s farm labor contractor act (FLCA), chapter 19.30 RCW. The first question implicates RCW 19.30-.010(2). That statute defines a “farm labor contractor” as “any *175person, or his or her agent or subcontractor, who, for a fee, performs any farm labor contracting activity.” Another FLCA provision, RCW 19.30.010(3), then defines “farm labor contracting activity” as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunitySupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. ArmendarizWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Thompson/Center Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Smith v. Safeco Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Allen v. DameronWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Allen v. DameronWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Allen v. DameronWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Digital Alchemy Llc v. John Hancock Life Insurance Company (usa)Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- Garcia v. Stemilt Ag Services LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.