Legal Opinion

Hoffman v. Friedman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 3, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Kenton Circuit Court (Criminal, Common Law and Equity Division).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

William Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff, H. C. Hoffman, brought this suit against Joseph Friedman, Marcus Friedman and Sidney L. Friedman to recover the purchase price of twenty shares *318of stock in the Jaynes Dry Goods Company, on the ground that the sale was obtained by fraud. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of the defendants and plaintiff appeals.

It appears that the Jaynes Dry Goods Company was incorporated in the year 1910. Joseph, Marcus and Sidney L. Friedman owned $20,000.00 worth of stock of the company. William Jaynes and H. A. Oelrich…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Livermore v. Middlesborough Town Lands Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
  2. Cole v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  3. Gooch v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Taylor v. MullinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  5. Bewley v. MoremenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Harkness' Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  2. Riddell v. KirbyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API