Legal Opinion

City of Statesville v. Jenkins

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 2, 1930PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STACY, C. J., dissenting; BROGDEN, J., concurs in dissent. This is a controversy without action, the agreed statement of facts is as follows:

1. The city of Statesville is a municipal corporation and as such, under the general law and by the provisions of its charter, is authorized to pave the streets in said city of Statesville and to make a local assessment against the property abutting thereon for a part of the costs of said pavement.

2. That in the year 1912, the said city of Statesville caused to be levied against the property hereinafter described a street assessment for the principal…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Graves v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  3. Town of Morganton v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
  4. Humphrey v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  5. Gillespie v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
  2. Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Charlotte v. . KavanaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API