City of Statesville v. Jenkins
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
STACY, C. J., dissenting; BROGDEN, J., concurs in dissent. This is a controversy without action, the agreed statement of facts is as follows:
1. The city of Statesville is a municipal corporation and as such, under the general law and by the provisions of its charter, is authorized to pave the streets in said city of Statesville and to make a local assessment against the property abutting thereon for a part of the costs of said pavement.
2. That in the year 1912, the said city of Statesville caused to be levied against the property hereinafter described a street assessment for the principal…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ashley v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Graves v. . HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Town of Morganton v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920
- Humphrey v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Gillespie v. . AllisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Bristow Ex Rel. Hedges v. GroomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Bateman v. . SterrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Charlotte v. . KavanaughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Sheets v. . WalshSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Town of Saluda v. County of PolkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.