Stewart v. Plank

DANIEL E. SCOTT, Presiding Judge.

A full order of child protection, effective for one year, was entered against Appellant pursuant to §§ 455.500 et seq. 1 His sole appeal point claims “the only evidence of purported abuse was hearsay testimony ... with no evidence that the children were physically or emotionally injured.” Much of the trial evidence was hearsay, but it was received largely without objection and cannot now be challenged on that basis. 2 The evidence thus received supports the judgment. We affirm.

Appellant’s limited challenge means we can similarly confine our review. As to the…