Legal Opinion
Louis v. Mobil Chemical Co.
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
Decided May 1, 2008No. 09-06-568 CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES KREGER, Justice.
After his employment with Mobil Chemical Company ceased, Thomas Louis sued his former employer and two supervisors, James Bowser and Randall Roy, for intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, and retaliation. The trial court granted summary judgment for all defendants. The four issues raised by Thomas on appeal contend material fact issues exist as to each of the claims and that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. We find no error and affirm the judgment.
Louis alleged that he falsified equipment safety reports at the direction of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Randall's Food Markets, Inc. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
- Continental Coffee Products Co. v. CazarezTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Malooly Brothers, Inc. v. NapierTexas Supreme Court · 1970
- Sabine Pilot Service, Inc. v. HauckTexas Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- in Re Steven and Shyla Lipsky and Alisa Rich, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2013
- Safeshred, Inc. v. MartinezTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Draker v. Schreiber, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2008
- Ove Akerblom v. Ezra Holdings LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Cummins v. SUNTRUST CAPITAL MARKETS, INC.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.