Legal Opinion

Nesmith v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 19, 1990No. 1 CA-SA 90-030PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

We accept jurisdiction in this special action to settle whether the trial court improperly dismissed one of the plaintiff’s claims as a sanction for abusing discovery. We hold that the trial court erred, and we vacate its order of dismissal without prejudice to reconsider appropriate sanctions upon a proper consideration of fact and proper application of law.

This case presented the trial judge with a frustrating dilemma that is typical of dis- eovery difficulties. While the plaintiffs counsel has conceded that he was dilatory in some respects, many of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Societe Internationale Pour Participations Industrielles Et Commerciales, S. A. v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. Kenneth Edgar, D/B/A Defense Surplus Sales Expeditors v. William J. Slaughter, D/B/A Champlin Food & Fuel Center, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  3. Birds International Corp. v. Arizona Maintenance Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  4. Robinson v. HigueraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
  5. Treadaway v. MeadorArizona Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Souza v. Fred Carries Contracts, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Green v. Lisa Frank, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. Wayne Cook Enterprises, Inc. v. Fain Properties Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. State v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API