Legal Opinion

Arundel Corp. v. Federal Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1950Published

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The action is upon an insurance policy to cover the plaintiff’s liability for property damage, personal injuries or death in carrying out a contract with the State of New York to widen and deepen a portion of the State Barge Canal near Borne, N. Y. The facts were stipulated and the only question is whether on the facts so stipulated the grounding of a barge, Seaboard #44, was covered by the policy.

The plaintiff’s contract with the State obligated it to widen and deepen the existing twelve foot deep, seventy-five foot wide channel to a depth of fourteen feet and a width of 104 feet, by cutting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marine Transit Corp. v. Northwestern Fire & Marine Ins.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1933
  2. Waldie v. Steers Sand & Gravel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  3. Gulf Oil Corp. v. BaltimoreDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1942
  4. Bee Line Transp. Co. v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API