Legal Opinion

Sanderson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1926No. 10116Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

We did not deem it necessary to discuss at length appellant’s exceptions to paragraph three of the charge of the court. Paragraph two of said charge is as follows:

“You are charged herein that before you can find the defendant, E. M. Sanderson, guilty of the offense of embezzlement, you must find, beyond a reasonable doubt: (1) That the defendant was the agent of the corporation, as alleged, and that by the terms of his employment he was charged with receiving the property of his principal. (2) That he did so receive property belonging to his principal.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Turner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Welk v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Pope v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API