Kennedy v. Cumberland Engineering Co., Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1DissentMurray, Justice
While recognizing the legitimate concern of my colleagues in upholding a statute that effectively denies redress to the injured plaintiff, I must respectfully dissent upon the ground that G.L.1956 (1969 Reenactment) § 9-l-13(b), as amended by P.L.1978, ch. 299, § 2, is well within the legislative power as defined by our constitution.
The majority opinion’s reliance upon article I, section 5, of our constitution to invalidate § 9 — 1—13(b) is both misguided and misplaced in light of the previous holdings of this court. That section, as the majority recognizes, has been most frequently employed…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.