Rosenthal's Estate

Ladner, J.,

The industry of the master and the painstaking care with which he has reviewed the evidence and prepared his report and supplemental report on the exceptions now before us, has spared us the necessity of an elaborate discussion of the questions argued.

In Rankin v. Rankin, 224 Pa. 514, 516, it was held that findings of fact by a master or an auditor will not be revised where the evidence is such as to require its submission to a jury. Such finding is entitled to the weight of a verdict of a jury and clear error must be pointed out before the court will disturb it. The reason for the…