Enott v. Hinkle
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle
This action seeks a declaratory judgment construing an oral farm lease. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff and defendants have taken this appeal.
Prom the record it appears that for a number of years the *207plaintiff had leased certain farm land from the defendants under an oral crop sharing arrangement. In the Fall of 1958 the parties had several conversations regarding their oral lease. The defendants contend that they asked the plaintiff to farm some additional land, but that plaintiff advised them he was through. The defendants…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
- Horst v. StaleyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996