Legal Opinion

Enott v. Hinkle

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1962No. 10224PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

This action seeks a declaratory judgment construing an oral farm lease. The cause was tried before the court sitting without a jury. Judgment was entered for the plaintiff and defendants have taken this appeal.

Prom the record it appears that for a number of years the *207plaintiff had leased certain farm land from the defendants under an oral crop sharing arrangement. In the Fall of 1958 the parties had several conversations regarding their oral lease. The defendants contend that they asked the plaintiff to farm some additional land, but that plaintiff advised them he was through. The defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Atlantic-Pacific Oil Co. v. Gas Development Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Horst v. StaleyMontana Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Rasmussen v. LeeMontana Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API