Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Henderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 9, 1976No. 74-258Published

1Concurrence

Mr. JUSTICE STOUDER,

specially concurring:

I do not agree with the view of the majority that the flight instruction was properly given.

It is fundamental that no instruction should be given which is not reasonably supported by the evidence, or which is not based on some theory logically deductible from some portion of the evidence. 14A Ill. L. & Pr. Criminal Law, §702 (1968).

In People v. Craven, 54 Ill. 2d 419, 299 N.E.2d 1, the principal case relied upon by the majority, the State’s case-in-chief showed that the defendant ran from the scene of thé crime after shooting the victim. The defendant…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alberty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. The People v. DukesIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. People v. CravenIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  5. The People v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API