Legal Opinion

People v. Ressler

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1966PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.

The judgment of conviction was properly reversed and a new trial granted by the Appellate Division on account of the admission in evidence of the statement by defendant taken at the police station after his law firm had contacted the police (24 A D 2d 7). The misleading answer given by the Chief of Detectives that there was nothing wrong and no need for a lawyer threw defense counsel off guard, and the consequence is the same as though the police had been instructed by an attorney for defendant that he was not to be interrogated in the absence of counsel (People v. Gunner, 15 N Y 2d 226;…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. BoettcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. RodriguezNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Plummer v. RothwaxNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. GriceNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  5. Cox v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API