Legal Opinion

J. P. Morgan Paving Co. v. Shoemaker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 22, 1925No. 6 Div. 372PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSomerhilhe, J.

The demurrer attacks the complaint for its alleged joinder of two distinct causes of action in a single count, viz. the maintenance of an asphalt mixer and boiler, and also the keeping of a large number of mules, in close proximity to plaintiff’s house. The theory of the demurrer is that these aie separate and distinct nuisances in operation and effect, and the principle invoked is that laid down in Iron City Mining Co. v. Hughes, 144 Ala. 608, 42 So. 39 :

“While, under our system of pleading as well 'as under the common law, counts for distinct and independent torts, of the same nature, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Eufaula v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  2. Yolande Coal & Coke Co. v. PierceAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Iron City Mining Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Steel Cities Chemical Co. v. JenkinsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Peck v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Peck v. HendersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API