Legal Opinion

Budkiewicz v. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1958No. 29,562Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion

Achor, J.

I am of the opinion that the complaint fails to state a cause of action under either of the specific acts of negligence upon which the majority opinion is predicated. The first such act of negligence is the assumed violation of §10-3904, Burns’ 1956 Repl. [Acts 1905, ch. 169, §666, p. 584], which prohibits Railroads from permitting their trains to remain standing upon highway crossings. However, with regard to this issue the appellant has not alleged in his complaint or contended either in his briefs or in oral argument that the negligence complained of constituted…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Toledo & Wabash Railway Co. v. GoddardIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Philadelphia & Reading Railroad v. DillonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1921
  3. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Pennsylvania Railroad Co. v. HussIndiana Court of Appeals · 1932
  5. State Ex Rel. Ayer v. EwingIndiana Supreme Court · 1952

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API