Davis v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
Although the precise inquiry here involved has not heretofore been before either of our two courts of review, each has dealt with questions somewhat similar, and the conclusions reached were in harmony with the view that under the facts stated the trial court did not lose jurisdiction. See Short v. Dowling, 138 Ga. 834 (76 S. E. 359); Hancock v. Rogers, 140 Ga. 688 (79 S. E. 558); Scoggins v. State, 24 Ga. App. 110 (100 S. E. 18); Neal v. State, 104 Ga. 509 (30 S. E. 858, 42 L. R. A. 190, 69 Am. St. R. 175), where Mr. Justice Eish, afterwards Chief Justice, examined and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Miller v. AderholdSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Neal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Hancock v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- McLaughlin v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Kaiser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
- Sherman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Pavlich v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
- Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
- Pace v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.