Daniel Pratt Gin Co. v. Timmerman
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Buchanan, J., Aiken, April, 1901. Action by Mrs. Julia A. Pratt and others, doing business under firm name of Daniel Pratt Gin. Co., against J. E. & R. H. Timmerman. The Circuit decree is as follows: “This case came on to be heard at Aiken, and was heard by the Court upon the pleadings, exhibits, evidence and a guaranty.
Read the full summary
Before Buchanan, J., Aiken, April, 1901. Action by Mrs. Julia A. Pratt and others, doing business under firm name of Daniel Pratt Gin. Co., against J. E. & R. H. Timmerman. The Circuit decree is as follows: “This case came on to be heard at Aiken, and was heard by the Court upon the pleadings, exhibits, evidence and a guaranty. The complaint alleges a sale of certain ginning and belt outfits to the defendants, which articles so sold and delivered to the defendants are specifically set out in an itemized list and are valued at the sum of $1,444. It was provided that payment should be made as…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
On the 23d of May, 1899, the Daniel Pratt Gin Co., of Prattsville, Ala., entered into a contract with the appellants, by which they were to1 deliver a gin system, consisting of gins, separators, distributors, suction pipes, fans, pipes for removal of seed, a press and many other parts therein set forth, among which was a line shaft with a system of pulleys thereon — one of which in size had to be arranged with reference to the driving pulley on the engine, so that the driving pulley on the engine would operate on the driving pulley on…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Pratt v. TimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1904