Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Smith

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided September 4, 2025No. 1:24-cv-00378Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA NATHAN E. BROOKS, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 1:24-cv-00378-CEA-CHS ) JOE SMITH, et. al., ) Defendants. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. Introduction Nathan Brooks, pro se, is proceeding in forma pauperis [Doc. 1]. This Court is responsible for screening all actions filed by plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis and for dismissing any action or portion thereof which is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API