Legal Opinion

Caplan v. MALLORY

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided December 18, 2020No. 0:19-cv-62103Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 19-62013-CIV-SMITH/VALLE HOWARD MICHAEL CAPLAN, Plaintiff, vs. HOWARD MALLORY, ET AL., Defendants. / ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Valle’s Report and Recommendation to District Judge (“R&R”) [DE 31], in which she recommends denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment and Application for Attorney’s Fees, Costs, Expert Witness Fees, and Litigation Expenses [DE 28] because Defendants were not properly served. Plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. YORK COMM. INC. v. Furst Group, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  2. Saridis v. VISTA ST. LUCIE ASSOC. INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API