Underwood v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Commissioner.
The appellants, Bradford and Emma Underwood, are husband and wife. They were jointly indicted, tried and convicted of violation of ICRS 434.010. Bradford Underwood received sentence of imprisonment for seven years; Emma’s sentence was fixed at imprisonment for five years.
In their joint appeal appellants assign the following claimed errors: (1) A separate trial should have been granted for. Emma pursuant to RCr 9.16; (2) the court failed to properly instruct the jury as to the limited purpose of the proof of other crimes; (3) the court erroneously instructed the jury; and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hoskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
- Broughton v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
- Waggner v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Rogers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
- MacOm v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tinsley v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
- Pankey v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Rachel v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
- State v. TapiaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- Fanelli v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.