Legal Opinion

Jewel Mining Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided March 25, 1941No. Docket No. 99266Published

Petitioner in 1930 leased coal mining rights in a tract of land and subsequently, before the taxable year, subleased these rights in a portion of the acreage covered by the original lease, reserving certain royalties. Mining operations were carried on during the taxable year by the sublessee and the petitioner, each on the land of which it was the ultimate lessee.

Read the full summary

Petitioner in 1930 leased coal mining rights in a tract of land and subsequently, before the taxable year, subleased these rights in a portion of the acreage covered by the original lease, reserving certain royalties. Mining operations were carried on during the taxable year by the sublessee and the petitioner, each on the land of which it was the ultimate lessee. Petitioner treated income from its own operations and royalties from its sublessee as income from a single property in computing depletion. Held, petitioner has properly treated the income from the two sources as arising from a…

1Opinion of the Court

JEWEL MINING COMPANY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Jewel Mining Co. v. Commissioner

Docket No. 99266.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

43 B.T.A. 1123; 1941 BTA LEXIS 1410;

March 25, 1941, Promulgated

Petitioner in 1930 leased coal mining rights in a tract of land and subsequently, before the taxable year, subleased these rights in a portion of the acreage covered by the original lease, reserving certain royalties. Mining operations were carried on during the taxable year by the sublessee and the petitioner, each on the land of which it was the ultimate lessee.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jewel Mining Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API