Legal Opinion

Isenstein v. Rosewell

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1985No. 60600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

The plaintiffs in these cases (hereinafter referred to as Isenstein and Boley) filed class action suits in the circuit court of Cook County challenging the authority of defendants Thomas C. Hynes, county assessor, and Edward J. Rosewell, county treasurer and ex-officio county collector, to assess and collect rollback taxes on farmland for tax years 1977 and thereafter. Plaintiffs sought injunctive relief and a refund of all rollback taxes paid. The circuit court consolidated both causes and initially issued a preliminary injunction enjoining the county from distributing any rollback taxes…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Eitel v. LindheimerIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Illinois Glass Co. v. Chicago Telephone Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1908
  3. O'Connor v. a & P EnterprisesIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Getto v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Atkins v. Deere & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In re Estate of BoyarIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Arra v. First State Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Community Convalescent Center of Naperville, Inc. v. First Interstate Mortgage Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Freund v. Avis Rent-A-Car System, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API