Legal Opinion

Mixon v. Walker & Walker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 4, 1911No. 3257PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Attachment; from city court of Richmond county — Judge Eve. February 16, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

To state thus much of the facts will be sufficient to illustrate the point which is decided and which, as we see it, controls the case. On March 3, 1908, Mixon gave to Walker & 'Walker his promissory noto for $1,053.33, the $53.33 representing interest. Mixon was a planter and Walker & Walker were factors. This note did not .represent any then existing indebtedness, but was given for the purpose of 'securing advances of money, to be made from time to time by Walker & Walker, in order to enable Mixon to make his crops. On the day the note was given, he got $500, and pn April 4 he got $250…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Irwin v. WilliarSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Benton & Brother v. SingletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Clarke, Harrison & Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
  4. Singleton v. Bank of MonticelloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. National Bank v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Allen v. SamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Hutchinson v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API