Max v. Northington (In Re Northington)
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1DissentWilson, Circuit Judge
This should be an easy case. The Bankruptcy Code provides—and the Supreme Court and this Circuit agree—that a confirmed Chapter 13 bankruptcy plan enjoys a preclusive, binding effect. A creditor may only escape treatment under a plan if it objects to plan confirmation and then appeals the overruling of that objection. Title Max admitted to the bankruptcy judge, on the record, that it did not object, and the bankruptcy judge confirmed the plan. Title Max now says that it did object and that it therefore can elude the plan’s terms. But the law required an objection before plan confirmation, not…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Wagner v. Daewoo Heavy Industries America Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.