Legal Opinion

Goldberg's Corp. v. the Goldberg Realty

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 29, 1944No. Docket 149/701PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A prompt decision of the present motion is earnestly desired by the interested parties. I shall accommodate them.

The defendants seek an order striking out the original and supplemental bills filed by the complainant in this cause. In substance, the reasons assigned are that the associated bills fail to charge a cause of action within the jurisdictional cognizance of this court. Rule 69. The motion is, of course, the modern equivalent of a demurrer under the former practice and carries with it, for immediate purposes, an acknowledgment of the truth of all the material and adequately pleaded…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Stammelman v. Interstate Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
  3. Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Maihack v. MehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  2. Westfield, C., Inc. v. Middlesex-Union, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API