Goldberg's Corp. v. the Goldberg Realty
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
A prompt decision of the present motion is earnestly desired by the interested parties. I shall accommodate them.
The defendants seek an order striking out the original and supplemental bills filed by the complainant in this cause. In substance, the reasons assigned are that the associated bills fail to charge a cause of action within the jurisdictional cognizance of this court. Rule 69. The motion is, of course, the modern equivalent of a demurrer under the former practice and carries with it, for immediate purposes, an acknowledgment of the truth of all the material and adequately pleaded…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Goerke Kirch Co. v. Goerke Kirch Holding Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
- Stammelman v. Interstate Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Standard Oil Co. of N.J. v. NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maihack v. MehlNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- Westfield, C., Inc. v. Middlesex-Union, C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947