Legal Opinion

Wolking v. Lindner

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 3, 2024No. 3:23-cv-00806Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : STACEY WOLKING and DARYL WOLKING, : Plaintiffs CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:23-cv-806 : v. (JUDGE MANNION) : HENRY LINDNER and YOUNGS APOTHECARY, INC., d/b/a : TUNKHANNOCK COMPOUNDING CENTER, : Defendants : MEMORANDUM Plaintiffs, who claim that Defendant Tunkhannock Compounding Center was negligent in its care of Stacey Wolking, (Doc. 1), have requested from Defendant certain information relating to other patients, (Doc. 45), to which requests TCC objects. (Doc. 46). The court ordered that the parties submit supplemental briefing regarding…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lykes v. YatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Buckman v. VerazinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Gail v. New England Gas Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API