Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Fairbanks

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1876No. 5741PublishedCited by 4 opinions

PPEAL from the Fifth District Court, parish of Orleans. Cullom, J„

1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.

The plaintiff sued defendants for rent and provisionally seized the movable property in the premises, consisting of sugar and molasses, as subject to the lessor’s privilege. C. Cavaroc & Son intervened, claiming the said property as owners. Plaintiff reconvened, alleging that Cavaroc & Son were partners of Fairbanks & Gilman, and liable in solido with them for the rent and damages claimed in the main action.

Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff against .defendants, with privilege on the property seized, rejecting the demand of the interven-ors and that of plaintiff in the reconvention,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Loque v. Baptist-Golding Motor Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  2. Henry Rose Mercantile & Mfg. Co. v. StearnsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
  3. Graham Paper Co. v. LewisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Sabine Supply Co. v. Cameron Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API