Legal Opinion
Hiett v. Barcroft Beach, Inc.
Fairfax County Circuit Court
Decided December 7, 1989No. Case No. (Law) 85646PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By JUDGE THOMAS J. MIDDLETON
Four of the five named defendants in this suit seek summary judgment. Oral argument was heard on October 27, 1989. For the reasons stated below, summary judgment is granted as to defendants Lake Barcroft Community Association (hereafter "LABARCA"), Barcroft Beach, Inc. (hereafter "BBI") and Barcroft Lake Management Association, Inc. (hereafter "B ARLAMA") [but] denied as to defendant Penland.
BBI is a Virginia corporation which owns an artificial lake known as Lake Barcroft, located in the Lake Barcroft Subdivision, Fairfax County, Virginia. See BBI’s Answer and…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ciofalo v. Vic Tanney Gyms, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Lee v. Allied Sports Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Arnold v. Shawano County Agricultural SocietyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Zimmer v. Mitchell and NessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Barnes v. New Hampshire Karting Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kocinec v. Public Storage, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
- Morrison v. Star City Roller Skating Centers, Inc.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 1992