Legal Opinion

Covey Motor Car Co. v. Hurlburt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1922PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcBBIDE, J.

We have here, as weli as the questions passed upon in Northwest Auto Go. v. Hurl-hurt, a state of facts indicating that subsequent to March 1, 1920, and before the taxes had been equalized, the vehicles in question had been sold into private ownership and the individual licenses required by law had been secured- by the purchasers. It is claimed that such payment releases the dealers from the obligation to pay the personal property tax assessed against the dealers on March 1, 1920. With this contention we are unable to agree.

Section 4268, Or. L., has the effect to make the person who is the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miners & Merchants Bank v. Board of SupervisorsArizona Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Henderson v. State Tax CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Gatens Inv. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1937
  4. Oden Buick, Inc. v. RoehlNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Banfield v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API