Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Nelson

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1933No. 2263PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

Plaintiff in error prepared and had allowed a bill of exceptions setting out the testimony in narrative form, but before allowance, an amendment was allowed in which the defendant had the full stenographic copy of the testimony of all the witnesses for the defense and also the cross examination of the plaintiff.

Where there is controversy upon the question of the weight of the evidence, it is not satisfactory to have it presented in a narrative form, but the same having been allowed by the trial cqurt it must be accepted as presented.

Counsel for plaintiff interposed a motion in this court to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kristo v. KristoOhio Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Flatter v. FlatterOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Potter v. PotterOhio Court of Appeals · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API