Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Gomez
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided September 22, 1936PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The chief question for present determination is as to whether the conveyance by the committee of an incompetent during her lifetime of specifically devised realty effected an extinguishment of such devise.
The pertinent facts have been stipulated or are uncontroverted. The will in question was duly executed on August 14, 1903. By its twelfth item the particular realty in question, which was located in the State of New Jersey, was devised to the children of testatrix’s daughter, Louise A. Jacod, subject to a life estate in the daughter. The executors were authorized to sell the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rathbone v. . HooneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In Re the Accounting of National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Pardee v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
- In re the Estate of EbbetsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
- In re HolmesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re the Estate of ClarkNew York Surrogate's Court · 1977
- In re the Estate of ArmstrongNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936