State v. Sheppard
Supreme Court of Kansas
Appeal from Barton district court; Ansel R. Clark, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Doster, C.J.:
William Sheppard, the appellant, was convicted of maintaining the nuisance of a place where intoxicating liquors were kept for sale in violation of law. The claim of error most strenuously urged is that the court gave effect to that portion of section 8 of chapter 232, Laws of 1901 (Gen. Stat. 1901, §2500), which reads as follows :
“In all prosecutions, either under the state laws or. under municipal ordinances, for maintaining a common nuisance as hereinbefore defined, the finding of intoxicating liquors in the possession of one not…
2Cited by16 opinions
- State v. HaremzaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- State v. PotelloUtah Supreme Court · 1911
- Caffee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1915
- Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
- State v. NossamanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.