Legal Opinion
Viacom International Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 2010No. 07 Civ. 2103(LLS), 07 Civ. 3582(LLS)PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LOUIS L. STANTON, District Judge.
Defendants move for summary judgment that they are entitled to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’s (“DMCA”), 17 U.S.C. § 512(c), “safe harbor” protection against all of plaintiffs’ direct and secondary infringement claims, including claims for “inducement” contributory liability, because they had insufficient notice, under the DMCA, of the particular infringements in suit.
Plaintiffs cross-move for partial summary judgment that defendants are not protected by the statutory “safe harbor” provision, but “are liable for the intentional…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. CCBill LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Arista Records LLC v. Usenet. Com, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Viacom International, Inc. v. YouTube, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Wolk v. Kodak Imaging Network, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Capitol Records, Inc. v. Mp3tunes, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Capitol Records, LLC v. Vimeo, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Shelter Capital Partners LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.