Legal Opinion
William Iselin & Co. v. Burgess & Leigh, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1967PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell D. Schweitzer, J.
Petitioner seeks in this proceeding, pursuant to CPLB 5239, to vacate an execution levy made by the Sheriff on behalf of one of the respondents against the property and inventory of Haddock and Hiller, Inc. (hereinafter called “ Debtor ”) upon the ground that petitioner has a prior security interest and is entitled to immediate possession.
Petitioner is engaged in the business of factoring and commercial financing. The Debtor, one of petitioner’s clients, is currently unable to pay its obligations as they mature. The named respondents, other than the Sheriff, are judgment creditors of the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. MaloneyNew York Supreme Court · 1965
3Cited by21 opinions
- Grain Merchants of Indiana, Inc., Bankrupts, Mark L. France, Trustee v. Union Bank and Savings Company, Bellevue, OhioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1969
- CHEMTEX, LLC v. St. Anthony Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Murdock v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1971
- Wells v. Central Bank of Alabama, N.A.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1977
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. Central Penn National BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.