Legal Opinion
State v. Inzitari
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 2025No. SC21008Published
1Opinion of the Court
STATE OF CONNECTICUT v. MICHAEL INZITARI (SC 21008) McDonald, D’Auria, Mullins, Ecker, Alexander and Dannehy, Js.* Syllabus Pursuant to statute ((Rev. to 2019) § 53a-193 (13)), ‘‘child pornography’’ means ‘‘any visual depiction . . . of sexually explicit conduct, where the production of such visual depiction involves the use of a person under sixteen years of age engaging in sexually explicit conduct . . . .’’ Pursuant further to statute ((Rev. to 2019) § 53a-193 (14)), ‘‘sexually explicit conduct’’ means ‘‘actual or simulated (A) sexual intercourse . . . (B) besti- ality, (C) masturbation,…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.