Legal Opinion
Dimock v. Kadane
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)
Decided April 10, 2003No. 11-01-00351-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
W.G. ARNOT, III, Chief Justice.
Joe W. Dimock (Dimock) brought this partition action against Louise Kadane, Michael L. Gustafson, and Carr Staley as Co-Trustees of the Louise Trust (the Ka-dane Defendants). 1 Dimock and the Ka-dane Defendants are tenants in common in oil and gas leases. In the trial court, Dimock sought a partition by sale of the parties’ undivided interests in the leases. The Kadane Defendants filed a counterclaim for declaratory judgment. They asserted that the prior owners of the undivided interests in the leases impliedly waived the right to partition under the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Oake v. Collin CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1985
- Stable Energy, L.P. v. Kachina Oil & Gas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Warner v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Lichtenstein v. Lichtenstein Building CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Elrod v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- ExxonMobil Corp. v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Exxonmobil Corp. v. Valence Operating Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Larry Long and Woodbine Production Corporation v. Miken Oil, Inc. and Mike Tate, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015
- Repsol Oil and Gas USA, LLC as Successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC v. Matrix Petroleum, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2023