Legal Opinion

Lockwood v. Manhattan Storage & Warehouse Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1898PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Emma M. Lockwood', from a judgment, of the Supreme. Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New. York on the 23d day of' February, 1897, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction .of the court after a trial before the court and a jury.

1Opinion of the Court

Van Brunt, P. J.:

The defendant was a corporation organized for the purpose of’ carrying on the business and operations of owning, constructing, *69maintaining, using and operating a warehouse or warehouses for the general purposes of storage and safe-keeping of merchandise, furniture and other household effects, and any and all other goods and chattels. In addition to its business of general storage the defendant had at one of its warehouses a place set apart and used -as safe deposit vaults in which were separate safe deposit boxes or safes. These separate boxes or safes were rented to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Roberts v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cussen v. Southern California Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Greer v. Los Angeles Athletic ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. McDonald v. Wm. D. Perkins & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. West Cache Sugar Co. v. HendricksonUtah Supreme Court · 1920

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API