Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Cofield

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1964No. 8 Div. 951PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is another phase of Cofield’s struggle to escape punishment. See Cofield v. State, 41 Ala.App. 469, 136 So.2d 897 (appeal); Ex parte Cofield, 41 Ala.App. 662, 148 So.2d 656; Cofield v. State, 42 Ala.App. 90, 153 So.2d 251.

Cofield has filed:(a) Motion for leave to file petitions (1) for writ of error coram nobis (2) in forma pauperis.(b) Application for modification of sentence.

I

The giving of false testimony by State witnesses is alleged without any detail to show materiality, and hence whether judgment would have been prevented had the evidence been otherwise. The mere fact…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cofield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Ex Parte ThompsonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Cofield v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  4. Ex parte CofieldAlabama Court of Appeals · 1962

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broadnax v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  2. Robinson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1971
  3. Bailey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975
  4. Teeple v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API