Legal Opinion

Minact, Inc. v. Director of Revenue

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 2014No. SC93162Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, District Judge.

The director of revenue appeals a decision of the Administrative Hearing Commission holding that income from a “rabbi trust” used to fund a deferred compensation plan for company executives does not constitute “business income” subject to apportionment and taxation in Missouri pursuant to section 32.200, RSMo Supp.2013. 1 “Business income” under section 32.200 “includes income from tangible and intangible property if the acquisition, management, and disposition of the property constitute integral parts of the taxpayer’s regular trade or business…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allied-Signal, Inc. Ex Rel. Bendix Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. ASARCO Inc. v. Idaho State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Hoechst Celanese Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Sperry and Hutchinson Co. v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Street v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API