Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Roberts

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 30, 1959No. 270-59PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BYRNE, District Judge.

Defendants are in the business of addressing, stuffing, and mailing envelopes containing printed advertising matter on behalf of different business enterprises that are defendants’ customers. Defendants are charged with violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act in having failed to pay the minimum wages required by the Act, and in having failed to keep the requisite records, and this action is for injunctive relief to compel conformity with these provisions of the Act.

All of the defendants’ customers were located in California. Under their contract with their customers,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. Kentucky Finance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  2. H. J. Boisseau v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Harry Sorvas, Individually and Doing Business as Merit Protective ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
  2. Goldberg v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
  3. Mitchell v. BirkettDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1960
  4. Mitchell v. SorvasDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Goldberg v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API